Paytient vs RevSpring
Two Patient Payments & Billing vendors, side by side. Facts from public sources; judgments are ours.
At a glance
Derived from public facts · a rough scale, not a ranking
| Paytient | RevSpring | |
|---|---|---|
| Pricing model | Subscription (per user or PMPM) · Published per-employee monthly pricing, low single digits | Per-transaction / per-chart · Per-statement fees plus payment processing |
| Speed to go live | Benefit enrollment plus payroll deduction setup | Statement conversion project, one to three months |
| Automation model | Tech-enabled service · Interest-free health payment card | Software platform · Platform plus print and mail operations |
| Built for | Payers | Mid-size groups, Enterprise systems, Payers |
| Security posture | SOC 2 Type II | HITRUST, SOC 2 Type II, PCI DSS, HIPAA |
| Company maturity | 8 yrs (est. 2018) | 45 yrs (est. 1981) |
| Financial backing | $63M+ ($55.5M equity plus debt financing) · Series B | Private equity-owned (Frazier Healthcare Partners) |
| Named customers | 5 named | 2 named |
| Published results | No public numbers | Specific numbers public |
| Documented integrations | None documented | 3 listed |
| Third-party validation | None found | KLAS / analyst cited |
Bottom line
- Pick Paytient if you're an employer or health plan trying to soften high deductibles with interest-free payment accounts your members actually use.
- Pick RevSpring if you want a proven, analytics-driven statement and payment vendor that can run both print and digital at health system scale.
Paytient
Health payment accounts to pay medical bills over time
- Founded
- 2018
- HQ
- Columbia, MO
- Stage
- Series B
- Raised
- $63M+ ($55.5M equity plus debt financing)
What it does
- Health Payment Account card usable at point of care
- Interest-free repayment plans members set themselves
- No fees or credit checks for members
- Covers medical, dental, vision, pharmacy, and vet expenses
- Sponsor dashboard and utilization reporting
Where it's strong
- Members get a way to afford care without interest-bearing debt, which supports plan designs with higher deductibles.
- Sponsor-paid model means employees pay nothing to use it, driving adoption.
- Proven with large sponsors: 700 enterprise partners including Centene and Cigna.
What buyers should weigh
- The sponsor pays the fees, so ROI depends on measurable gains in care access, retention, or plan migration.
- It smooths bills rather than lowering them; it does not address underlying prices or billing errors.
- Value is limited for populations with low deductibles or minimal out-of-pocket exposure.
Named customers
Centene · Cigna · Coupe Health · Beta Health · R.R. Donnelley
RevSpring
Patient billing communications and payments at enterprise scale
- Founded
- 1981
- HQ
- Nashville, TN
- Stage
- Private equity-owned (Frazier Healthcare Partners)
- Raised
- n/a
What it does
- Print and digital patient billing statements
- PersonaPay payment portal and payment plans
- Analytics that tailor message and payment offers
- Omnichannel outreach: text, email, voice, mail
- Pre-service estimates and financial engagement
- Integrated payment processing via TrustCommerce
Where it's strong
- Proven at scale: 1.5 billion communications and over $8 billion in payments processed annually.
- Data-driven personalization measurably lifts patient payment rates versus generic statements.
- The TrustCommerce acquisition adds a widely deployed Epic-integrated payment gateway.
What buyers should weigh
- It is an incumbent print-heavy vendor at its core; digital-first rivals pitch faster innovation.
- Statement and processing fees add up, and switching statement vendors is disruptive mid-contract.
- PE ownership changes (GTCR to Frazier) can shift roadmap and pricing priorities.
Named customers
Geisinger Health Plan · Emory Healthcare
Integrations
Compare against the rest of Patient Payments & Billing
Deciding between these two?
First Pass tracks Patient Payments & Billing every week: funding, launches, and what changed since this page was written.