SparkChange vs Valer (Voluware)
Two Prior Authorization vendors, side by side. Facts from public sources; judgments are ours.
At a glance
Derived from public facts · a rough scale, not a ranking
| SparkChange | Valer (Voluware) | |
|---|---|---|
| Pricing model | Enterprise contract (custom) · Platform subscription plus services | Not published · custom quotes for health systems |
| Speed to go live | Health system project, impact claimed in 30 days | customized to each workflow and EHR |
| Automation model | Software platform · RPA-style automations plus analytics | Software platform · single portal for all payers |
| Built for | Enterprise systems | Mid-size groups, Enterprise systems |
| Security posture | SOC 2 Type II, HIPAA | HITRUST |
| Company maturity | 8 yrs (est. 2018) | 14 yrs (est. 2012) |
| Financial backing | Bootstrapped | PE-backed (Hughes & Company) |
| Named customers | 4 named | 1 named |
| Published results | No public numbers | No public numbers |
| Documented integrations | 2 listed | 4 listed |
| Third-party validation | None found | None found |
Bottom line
- Pick SparkChange if you run a health system on Oracle Health and want missing and retroactive authorizations caught and fixed before they become denials.
- Pick Valer if your staff juggles dozens of payer portals and faxes for prior auths and you want one submission and tracking hub across all service lines.
SparkChange
Finds missing auths and fixes them before denials
- Founded
- 2018
- HQ
- Kansas City, MO
- Stage
- Bootstrapped
- Raised
- n/a
What it does
- Detects auth-required services upstream of scheduling
- Flags and corrects auth discrepancies after service
- Automates retro-authorization before claims go out
- Auto-builds appeals for historical auth denials
- Eligibility verification automation at health system scale
- Spark360 analytics for AR and payer performance
Where it's strong
- Handles the full auth lifecycle including retro-auth and denial appeals, not just submission.
- Founding team of Cerner revenue cycle engineers knows Millennium workflows from the inside.
- Published health system results, including 18,800 FTE hours saved at an academic system.
What buyers should weigh
- Depth is on Oracle Health (Cerner); Epic shops should probe fit carefully.
- Part platform, part consulting firm, so scope and staffing shape what you actually get.
- Self-funded regional company; smaller footprint than national auth vendors.
Named customers
Centra · University Health Kansas City · LMH Health · St. Joseph's Health
Integrations
Valer (Voluware)
Prior auth submission and tracking automation across payer portals
- Founded
- 2012
- HQ
- Huntington Beach, CA
- Stage
- PE-backed (Hughes & Company)
- Raised
- $7.6M disclosed
What it does
- Automated PA submission to 75+ payer portals
- Auto-completion of 1,000+ payer fax forms
- Automated status checking and verification
- Bi-directional EHR sync using standard 278/275 transactions
- Covers procedures, referrals, and services, not just drugs
- Reporting on turnaround times and staff productivity
Where it's strong
- Covers the messy middle of PA: portal and fax submissions that pure API-based tools cannot reach.
- Bi-directional Epic integration writes auth numbers and statuses back automatically.
- Workflow is configured per client rather than one-size-fits-all, which suits complex health system setups.
What buyers should weigh
- Small company with modest disclosed funding, so evaluate roadmap and support depth against bigger rivals.
- Portal and fax automation depends on payer sites staying stable; expect some maintenance lag when payers change portals.
- Per-client configuration means implementations take real effort compared with plug-and-play point tools.
Named customers
Oregon Health & Science University (OHSU)
Integrations
Compare against the rest of Prior Authorization
Deciding between these two?
First Pass tracks Prior Authorization every week: funding, launches, and what changed since this page was written.