Clean ClAImsFirst Pass

Cohere Health vs Valer (Voluware)

Two Prior Authorization vendors, side by side. Facts from public sources; judgments are ours.

At a glance

Derived from public facts · a rough scale, not a ranking

Cohere HealthValer (Voluware)
Pricing model

Enterprise contract (custom) · scoped by UM volume and model

Not published · custom quotes for health systems

Speed to go live

deep payer UM integration, multi-month program

customized to each workflow and EHR

Automation model

Software platform · AI-assisted utilization management decisioning

Software platform · single portal for all payers

Built for

Payers

Mid-size groups, Enterprise systems

Security posture

HITRUST, HIPAA

HITRUST

Company maturity

7 yrs (est. 2019)

14 yrs (est. 2012)

Financial backing

$200M · Series C

PE-backed (Hughes & Company)

Named customers

3 named

1 named

Published results

Specific numbers public

No public numbers

Documented integrations

3 listed

4 listed

Third-party validation

None found

None found

Bottom line

  • Pick Cohere Health if you are a health plan replacing legacy utilization management with AI-driven prior auth at Humana-proven scale.
  • Pick Valer if your staff juggles dozens of payer portals and faxes for prior auths and you want one submission and tracking hub across all service lines.

Cohere Health

Intelligent prior auth platform for payers

Founded
2019
HQ
Boston, MA
Stage
Series C
Raised
$200M

What it does

  • Automates prior auth intake, review, and approval for health plans
  • Auto-approves up to 90 percent of eligible auth requests
  • Applies evidence-based clinical policies and physician-facing nudges
  • Provider performance analytics to steer utilization management
  • Payment integrity claims validation via Cohere Validate
  • Delegated UM services across MSK, cardiology, imaging, sleep

Where it's strong

  • Proven at national scale: over 12 million prior auth requests a year across roughly 600,000 providers, including a nationwide Humana deployment.
  • High auto-approval rates (up to 90 percent) materially cut turnaround times and provider abrasion, which matters as CMS-0057 deadlines arrive.
  • Well capitalized at $200M raised and expanding beyond prior auth into payment integrity, reducing single-product risk.

What buyers should weigh

  • It sells to health plans, not providers; a provider organization only encounters Cohere through a payer that has adopted it.
  • Much of its track record is concentrated in the Humana relationship, so plans of smaller size should ask for comparable references.
  • Delegated UM and clinical policy alignment make implementations substantial projects with real compliance and integration work, not a light SaaS install.

Named customers

Humana · Geisinger Health Plan · Medical Mutual of Ohio

Integrations

Rhyme network for provider-side connectivityHealth plan UM and claims systemsFHIR-based APIs supporting CMS-0057 compliance
Full Cohere Health profile →

Valer (Voluware)

Prior auth submission and tracking automation across payer portals

Founded
2012
HQ
Huntington Beach, CA
Stage
PE-backed (Hughes & Company)
Raised
$7.6M disclosed

What it does

  • Automated PA submission to 75+ payer portals
  • Auto-completion of 1,000+ payer fax forms
  • Automated status checking and verification
  • Bi-directional EHR sync using standard 278/275 transactions
  • Covers procedures, referrals, and services, not just drugs
  • Reporting on turnaround times and staff productivity

Where it's strong

  • Covers the messy middle of PA: portal and fax submissions that pure API-based tools cannot reach.
  • Bi-directional Epic integration writes auth numbers and statuses back automatically.
  • Workflow is configured per client rather than one-size-fits-all, which suits complex health system setups.

What buyers should weigh

  • Small company with modest disclosed funding, so evaluate roadmap and support depth against bigger rivals.
  • Portal and fax automation depends on payer sites staying stable; expect some maintenance lag when payers change portals.
  • Per-client configuration means implementations take real effort compared with plug-and-play point tools.

Named customers

Oregon Health & Science University (OHSU)

Integrations

Epic (App Market)Oracle Health (Cerner)Payer web portalsPayer fax workflows
Full Valer (Voluware) profile →

Compare against the rest of Prior Authorization

Deciding between these two?

First Pass tracks Prior Authorization every week: funding, launches, and what changed since this page was written.