Clean ClAImsFirst Pass

Claimable vs Crosby Health

Two Denials & Appeals vendors, side by side. Facts from public sources; judgments are ours.

At a glance

Derived from public facts · a rough scale, not a ranking

ClaimableCrosby Health
Pricing model

Per-transaction / per-chart · about $40-50 per appeal, some free

Contingency (pay from recoveries) · Managed appeals; SaaS license also offered

Speed to go live

consumer self-serve, appeal drafted in minutes

Portal-based upload, light integration

Automation model

AI copilot · drafts evidence-backed appeal letters

Autonomous agents · Apollo LLM drafts and submits appeals

Built for

Small practices, Enterprise systems

Mid-size groups, Enterprise systems

Security posture

SOC 2 Type II, HIPAA

HIPAA

Company maturity

3 yrs (est. 2023)

4 yrs (est. 2022)

Financial backing

$10M · Seed

$2.2M+ · Seed

Named customers

None public

1 named

Published results

Specific numbers public

Specific numbers public

Documented integrations

None documented

None documented

Third-party validation

None found

None found

Bottom line

  • Pick Claimable if patients or one-off denials need fast, cheap, evidence-backed appeals with zero procurement.
  • Pick Crosby Health if clinical denials are piling up unworked and you want appeals generated and submitted automatically while paying only from what gets recovered.

Claimable

AI-generated appeals for denied health insurance claims

Founded
2023
HQ
Sacramento, CA
Stage
Seed
Raised
$10M

What it does

  • AI-drafted appeals citing policy terms and medical literature
  • Delivery to insurer appeals departments and executives
  • Coverage for 28 conditions and 90+ treatments
  • Support for 80+ medications including Humira and Dupixent
  • Case tracking with most resolved within 10 days

Where it's strong

  • Reports roughly 75 to 80% of appeals ending in overturned denials, far above typical patient appeal rates.
  • Flat per-case pricing around $50 makes it accessible without a contract or implementation.
  • Founding team combines clinical, payer, and VA data science backgrounds, and the escalation tactic of copying executives and regulators gets responses.

What buyers should weigh

  • Coverage is limited to a defined list of conditions and treatments, so many denial types are out of scope today.
  • The core product is patient-facing; provider and enterprise offerings are newer and less proven at volume.
  • It appeals one claim at a time and does not address the upstream documentation or authorization issues driving denials.
Full Claimable profile →

Crosby Health

AI-generated clinical appeals for denied claims

Founded
2022
HQ
New York, NY
Stage
Seed
Raised
$2.2M+

What it does

  • Generates clinical appeal letters for denied claims with AI
  • Apollo clinical LLM reads up to 300 pages of documentation
  • Finds medical necessity evidence inside clinical notes
  • Submits appeals through one unified payer submission channel
  • Tracks appeal status and payer decisions with notifications
  • Supports medical coding review and chart auditing

Where it's strong

  • Attacks a problem most providers simply abandon: appealing every denial, including small balances that are uneconomical to work manually.
  • Unified payer submission removes the portal-and-fax maze that makes appeals so labor intensive.
  • Early users report appealing denials 300% faster than manual processes.

What buyers should weigh

  • Very early company: roughly 15 employees, about $3M raised, and only one publicly named customer.
  • Appeals-only focus means it recovers lost revenue but does nothing to prevent denials upstream.
  • No publicly documented EHR integrations, so verify how clinical documentation actually gets into the platform.

Named customers

EmpowerMe Wellness

Full Crosby Health profile →

Compare against the rest of Denials & Appeals

Deciding between these two?

First Pass tracks Denials & Appeals every week: funding, launches, and what changed since this page was written.