Clean ClAImsFirst Pass

Amperos Health vs Crosby Health

Two Denials & Appeals vendors, side by side. Facts from public sources; judgments are ours.

At a glance

Derived from public facts · a rough scale, not a ranking

Amperos HealthCrosby Health
Pricing model

Not published

Contingency (pay from recoveries) · Managed appeals; SaaS license also offered

Speed to go live

No configuration; working day one

Portal-based upload, light integration

Automation model

Autonomous agents · AI biller calls and works denials

Autonomous agents · Apollo LLM drafts and submits appeals

Built for

Small practices, Mid-size groups, Billing companies

Mid-size groups, Enterprise systems

Security posture

SOC 2 Type I, HIPAA

HIPAA

Company maturity

3 yrs (est. 2023)

4 yrs (est. 2022)

Financial backing

$20.2M · Series A

$2.2M+ · Seed

Named customers

None public

1 named

Published results

Specific numbers public

Specific numbers public

Documented integrations

None documented

None documented

Third-party validation

None found

None found

Bottom line

  • Pick Amperos if denials and aging A/R are piling up and you want an AI biller chasing claims from day one with no setup project.
  • Pick Crosby Health if clinical denials are piling up unworked and you want appeals generated and submitted automatically while paying only from what gets recovered.

Amperos Health

AI biller that works denials by phone and portal

Founded
2023
HQ
New York, NY
Stage
Series A
Raised
$20.2M

What it does

  • Calls payers to check status and dispute denials
  • Works payer portals for claim follow-up
  • Drafts and submits appeals with medical records
  • Submits corrected claims
  • Denial analytics and root-cause reporting

Where it's strong

  • Automates the actual follow-up work, phone calls included, rather than just flagging denials for staff.
  • Real volume behind the claims: over 3,000 clinical locations served and roughly $700M in annual recovered revenue across 500,000-plus claims.
  • Pairs AI automation with human billing experts for complex claims instead of forcing everything through the model.

What buyers should weigh

  • Founded in 2023, so it is still a young vendor for a function that touches core cash flow.
  • Named reference customers are not public; ask for references in your specialty and billing system.
  • Best fit is denial follow-up and recovery; it is not a full front-to-back RCM platform.
Full Amperos Health profile →

Crosby Health

AI-generated clinical appeals for denied claims

Founded
2022
HQ
New York, NY
Stage
Seed
Raised
$2.2M+

What it does

  • Generates clinical appeal letters for denied claims with AI
  • Apollo clinical LLM reads up to 300 pages of documentation
  • Finds medical necessity evidence inside clinical notes
  • Submits appeals through one unified payer submission channel
  • Tracks appeal status and payer decisions with notifications
  • Supports medical coding review and chart auditing

Where it's strong

  • Attacks a problem most providers simply abandon: appealing every denial, including small balances that are uneconomical to work manually.
  • Unified payer submission removes the portal-and-fax maze that makes appeals so labor intensive.
  • Early users report appealing denials 300% faster than manual processes.

What buyers should weigh

  • Very early company: roughly 15 employees, about $3M raised, and only one publicly named customer.
  • Appeals-only focus means it recovers lost revenue but does nothing to prevent denials upstream.
  • No publicly documented EHR integrations, so verify how clinical documentation actually gets into the platform.

Named customers

EmpowerMe Wellness

Full Crosby Health profile →

Compare against the rest of Denials & Appeals

Deciding between these two?

First Pass tracks Denials & Appeals every week: funding, launches, and what changed since this page was written.