Notable vs Trase
Two RCM Automation Platforms vendors, side by side. Facts from public sources; judgments are ours.
At a glance
Derived from public facts · a rough scale, not a ranking
| Notable | Trase | |
|---|---|---|
| Pricing model | Enterprise contract (custom) · Custom enterprise deals, no public prices | Enterprise contract (custom) · No upfront fee, billed on efficiency gains |
| Speed to go live | First workflow live in weeks, no-code config | Prebuilt agent library deploys in weeks |
| Automation model | Autonomous agents · No-code agent platform, 15+ EHRs | Autonomous agents · Governed agent OS for regulated work |
| Built for | Mid-size groups, Enterprise systems | Enterprise systems |
| Security posture | HITRUST, HIPAA | SOC 2 Type I, HIPAA |
| Company maturity | 9 yrs (est. 2017) | Not disclosed |
| Financial backing | $119M · Series B | $117.5M ($10.5M pre-seed plus $107M seed) · Seed |
| Named customers | 5 named | 2 named |
| Published results | No public numbers | Specific numbers public |
| Documented integrations | EHR-agnostic | None documented |
| Third-party validation | None found | None found |
Bottom line
- Pick Notable if you run a health system and want patient-facing workflows like intake, scheduling, and authorizations automated in weeks without building anything internally.
- Pick Trase if you are an academic or large health system that wants governed AI agents across back-office workflows and prefers paying from measured efficiency gains.
Notable
AI agents across intake, auth, and revenue workflows
- Founded
- 2017
- HQ
- San Mateo, CA
- Stage
- Series B
- Raised
- $119M
What it does
- AI agents automate registration, intake, and scheduling workflows
- Handles referrals, prior authorizations, and care gap outreach
- HCC chart review for risk adjustment programs
- Flow Builder lets teams build automations low-code
- Voice AI agent handles patient calls
- Agents click into EHR fields and update records directly
Where it's strong
- Broadest workflow coverage in this group, spanning patient access, revenue cycle, and care operations on one platform, so it can consolidate point vendors.
- Proven at enterprise scale: 12,000+ sites of care, 1.5M tasks automated daily, and named systems like Intermountain, CommonSpirit, and Inova.
- Flow Builder and Sidekick let your own ops teams extend automations without waiting on the vendor.
What buyers should weigh
- A platform sale, not a point solution: expect a bigger implementation, higher price, and deeper IT commitment than single-workflow vendors.
- Doing many workflows means depth in any one (e.g., prior auth) may trail specialists; benchmark your highest-value workflow head-to-head.
- Last disclosed raise was the 2021 Series B, so ask directly about capitalization and profitability.
Named customers
Intermountain Health · Inova Health · MUSC Health · CommonSpirit Health · UC San Diego Health
Integrations
Trase
Governed AI agents for healthcare back-office work
- Founded
- n/a
- HQ
- McLean, VA
- Stage
- Seed
- Raised
- $117.5M ($10.5M pre-seed plus $107M seed)
What it does
- AI agents for inbound fax triage and routing
- Patient access workflow automation
- Revenue cycle task automation
- HIPAA and SOC 2 compliant agent platform
- Governance and oversight controls for agent actions
Where it's strong
- Live health system deployment at Duke, where fax triage ran 7.1 times faster than manual processing and saved about 1,395 staff hours a month.
- The $107M seed led by ARCH Venture Partners gives it unusual capital depth for a company at this stage.
- Pricing tied to measured efficiency gains lowers the risk of paying for software that does not perform.
What buyers should weigh
- The company only came out of stealth in November 2025, so the reference base beyond Duke Health is thin.
- The platform spans healthcare, defense, and other regulated industries, so healthcare-specific product depth may lag single-focus rivals.
- Published results center on fax triage; patient access and RCM claims have less public evidence.
Named customers
Duke Health · U.S. Navy
Compare against the rest of RCM Automation Platforms
Deciding between these two?
First Pass tracks RCM Automation Platforms every week: funding, launches, and what changed since this page was written.