Clean ClAImsFirst Pass

Candid Health vs Stedi

Two Claims & Clearinghouses vendors, side by side. Facts from public sources; judgments are ours.

At a glance

Derived from public facts · a rough scale, not a ranking

Candid HealthStedi
Pricing model

Percent of collections · ~3% of collections, +$6/claim coded

Per-transaction / per-chart · Published pay-as-you-go rates, volume tiers, no minimum

Speed to go live

API integration built by your engineers

Self-serve signup, your developers integrate the API

Automation model

Software platform · API-first billing rules engine

Data / network utility · API-first clearinghouse

Built for

Mid-size groups, Enterprise systems

Billing companies, Enterprise systems, Payers

Security posture

SOC 2 Type I, HIPAA

SOC 2 Type II, HIPAA

Company maturity

7 yrs (est. 2019)

9 yrs (est. 2017)

Financial backing

$99.5M · Series C

$142M · Series C

Named customers

5 named

5 named

Published results

Specific numbers public

Specific numbers public

Documented integrations

5 listed

4 listed

Third-party validation

None found

None found

Bottom line

  • Pick Candid Health if you're a digital health company with engineers on staff and want to run billing through an API instead of hiring a billing team.
  • Pick Stedi if you have engineers and want a modern clearinghouse API with transparent per-transaction pricing you can start testing today.

Candid Health

Automated billing infrastructure for digital health

Founded
2019
HQ
San Francisco, CA
Stage
Series C
Raised
$99.5M

What it does

  • Automated claim creation, coding rules, and submission
  • Rules engine that fixes claim errors before submission
  • Denial tracking and automated resubmission workflows
  • Payment posting and ERA reconciliation
  • RCM reporting and analytics across payers
  • GenAI features for billing operations

Where it's strong

  • The rules-engine approach measurably cuts manual billing work; Talkiatry reported 40% less manual effort while absorbing 45% year-over-year claims growth.
  • API-first design plus prebuilt EHR integrations (Elation, Healthie, Canvas) fit cleanly into digital health tech stacks.
  • Well funded and growing fast, with $99.5M raised, 200+ customers, and back-to-back rounds six months apart.

What buyers should weigh

  • It is built for tech-forward provider groups and telehealth companies with standardized, high-volume claims; complex hospital and facility billing is not its proven ground.
  • Getting full value from the platform usually requires engineering work on integration and data plumbing, not just a billing-team rollout.
  • It is a young venture-backed vendor competing against large incumbents like Waystar and R1, so weigh long-term durability and your negotiating position at renewal.

Named customers

Talkiatry · Nourish · Allara · Tia · Ophelia

Integrations

ElationHealthieCanvasMedplumDevelo
Full Candid Health profile →

Stedi

API-first clearinghouse for developers

Founded
2017
HQ
New York, NY
Stage
Series C
Raised
$142M

What it does

  • Real-time eligibility checks via JSON API (270/271)
  • Insurance discovery when patient coverage is unknown
  • Claim submission and claim status via API (837/276)
  • Electronic remittance advice (ERA) retrieval
  • Payer transaction enrollments managed programmatically
  • Batch eligibility checks at high volume

Where it's strong

  • Everything is accessible via API with public docs and transparent self-serve onboarding, which legacy clearinghouses like Availity and Optum do not offer.
  • Support is unusually fast for the category, with a median ticket response under seven minutes across 1,500+ shared support channels.
  • Well capitalized ($142M raised, backed by Stripe and Addition) with rapid traction: paying customers up 6x and billed transactions up 7x year over year into 2026.

What buyers should weigh

  • It is clearinghouse rails, not a billing service; you need engineers to build eligibility and claims workflows on top of it.
  • Its direct payer network is younger than Availity's or Optum's, so some connections still route through intermediary partners.
  • The company only pivoted from general-purpose EDI to healthcare around 2023, so its healthcare-specific track record is short.

Named customers

Pair Team · Tennr · Candid Health · Nirvana · Berry Street

Integrations

3,400+ payer connectionsX12 EDICAQH CORE SOAPJSON REST APIs
Full Stedi profile →

Compare against the rest of Claims & Clearinghouses

Deciding between these two?

First Pass tracks Claims & Clearinghouses every week: funding, launches, and what changed since this page was written.